Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?
If not, the reason could be your gender.
Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.
Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.
Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.
Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.
A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.
"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.
Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.
The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.
Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.
"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."
She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."
Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.
"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.
These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.
Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.
According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."
A passionate eSports journalist and former competitive gamer, dedicated to uncovering the stories behind the screens.