What hell is the world of governance. Look around that government frontbench: each person is grappling with near impossible portfolios lacking the resources to do what they know is needed.
Their inheritance was more catastrophic than expected: they were bequeathed landmines, deceptive pitfalls and massive deficits. Brexit is emerging as more economically devastating than expected, currently costing the exchequer £80bn a year.
They face bad luck: the Trump destroyer coincided with their watch. What more unfortunate incident than a jail staff member setting free a refused asylum-seeker individual convicted of sexual crimes? Small boat arrivals feel relentless.
An ill-advised leadership contest at this moment was bound to give Keir Starmer a setback. The minimal electoral backing at the Caerphilly Senedd byelection might not even be their worst performance.
They prepare for hostility, but they are human. As often, the Health Secretary courageously expresses what all can see: that there is "deep disillusionment in this country at the moment" and "a growing sense of despair about whether anyone is capable of turning this country round".
Nevertheless, the contemporary bitter state of popular sentiment is confusing and concerning. The Prime Minister is the least popular prime minister on record. Really?
He represents a decent, serious man of good intentions, without undue arrogance or ego. Measure this against the former Prime Minister, the brief Conservative leader, or the casual assumption of the former Conservative leader, all with so little to explain their overconfidence.
But, say the people, Starmer is worse. As the nation's leader, he demonstrates little charisma, they say: more seriously, he lacks policy adaptability, innovative approaches or understanding of where the wind blows.
The party erred regarding reductions to retirees and individuals with special needs, unbalanced by generosity elsewhere. Uncertain which voters to appeal to, ministers have permitted good policies uncelebrated, including employment protections to environmental funding, urban development and training opportunities for the next generation.
An excessive number of key consultants persist in thinking the Daily Mail-inflected right requires courting, when almost twice as many voters have leaned liberal since Labour took office. Election expert the polling authority advises the party to stop chasing Farage supporters: they've departed.
Keir Starmer is failing; this cannot be disputed when surveys indicate no leader could bounce back from such unprecedented lows.
Yet, during unprecedented territory of significant fluctuation, history may be no guide. The leader extracted Labour from the period following Corbyn state of despair that c conventional wisdom suggested couldn't be fixed in one term.
Would anyone else achieve superior results, or has society entered an almost impossible to govern, constantly dissatisfied electorate? Every administration may be dismissed equally quickly after taking office, regardless of electoral margin, except if it comes in a gilded chariot bearing untold bounty for stricken public services and financially strained households.
Unsurprisingly, concern within the parliamentary party will make talk of leadership change commonplace if the spring local elections go as poorly as forecast – or, certain observers propose, before that.
Here's ministers' paradox: Labour's only hope emerges from difficulty. Assume they will be overwhelmed anyway, so utilize their significant numbers for the remainder of the term to implement their genuine left-leaning values: implement substantial tax changes, generating substantial revenue.
Prepare for opposition subsequent votes, so do everything now. Disregard popularity ratings and focus groups; let voters see genuine commitment. The exclusive approach to restore some respect is to do transparently what they consider most right and fair.
The Chancellor rightly calls Reform "the primary risk" to national identity. As the Tories virtually merge with Reform, an electoral pact of certain type approaches.
The party's obligation is to take all necessary measures to prevent it. Prepare for coalition, remain palatable for progressive partners when the name of the party matters less than the essential limit against a political danger unknown in our lifetime.
That's a purpose to defeat discouragement.
A passionate eSports journalist and former competitive gamer, dedicated to uncovering the stories behind the screens.